Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,003,786 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.981% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 981.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $57,931, a difference of 7.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $119,756, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $46,972, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $69,174, a difference of 3.5%), median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $67,353, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $122,178, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 15.6%), poverty (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and female poverty (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 4.7%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.35%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 34.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.3%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.1%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.34%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and female disability (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.69%).