South African vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from China
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in South African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,701,225 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.223% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to a decrease of 223.2 Immigrants from China.
South African vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,160 compared to $119,756, a difference of 16.1%), median household income ($93,379 compared to $105,335, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $57,931, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $69,174, a difference of 5.4%), and per capita income ($50,044 compared to $54,264, a difference of 8.4%).
Income Metric | South African | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,044 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $113,229 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,379 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,752 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,460 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,825 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,383 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,160 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,719 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,652 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Poor 26.7% |
South African vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | South African | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.1% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
South African vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | South African | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
South African vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | South African | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Exceptional 83.2% |
South African vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 23.6%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (47.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | South African | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Exceptional 24.7% |
South African vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 47.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | South African | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Poor 6.0% |
South African vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 32.0%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.73%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
Education Level Metric | South African | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.4% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.7% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.4% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.1% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 3.1% |
South African vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | South African | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Fair 3.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |