Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from China
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,326,773 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.378% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 377.7 Immigrants from China.
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $119,756, a difference of 21.5%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $67,353, a difference of 19.6%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $54,264, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $69,174, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.0%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Poor 26.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.48%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.89%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 67.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |