Chinese vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Arapaho
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,990,930 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.919. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.480% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 479.7 Arapaho.
Chinese vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $75,945, a difference of 52.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $71,697, a difference of 45.4%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $67,965, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,383, a difference of 30.4%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $31,489, a difference of 31.7%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Chinese vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 99.7%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 94.5%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 35.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 40.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Arapaho |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Chinese vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 179.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 152.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 151.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Chinese vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 77.1% |
Chinese vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 55.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.2%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (68.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.64, a difference of 8.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Arapaho |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 47.1% |
Chinese vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.25%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chinese vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.2% |
Chinese vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Arapaho |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |