Ute vs Arapaho Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Arapaho
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Ute
Arapaho
16.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Arapaho Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,650,694 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,777,916 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 7.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Arapaho |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 59.1% | 58.3% |
| Range | 55.6% | 55.3% |
| Mean | 23.3% | 22.8% |
| Median | 17.9% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.0% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.9% | 28.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.0% | 15.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Arapaho by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Dominican (16.1%, a difference of 0.99%), Black/African American (15.8%, a difference of 2.7%), Paiute (15.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and Houma (16.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Colville (15.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Yakama (15.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Central American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |