Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sri Lankans

Arapaho

Good
Fair
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arapaho Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,235,884 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Arapaho.
Sri Lankan Integration in Arapaho Communities

Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $75,945, a difference of 42.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $71,697, a difference of 42.2%), and median household income ($93,093 compared to $67,965, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,201 compared to $59,383, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $44,003, a difference of 26.1%).
Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Income
Income MetricSri LankanArapaho
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,014
Tragic
$32,345
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,234
Tragic
$82,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,093
Tragic
$67,965
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,040
Tragic
$36,586
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,136
Tragic
$41,758
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,496
Tragic
$31,489
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,470
Tragic
$44,003
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,960
Tragic
$71,697
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,270
Tragic
$75,945
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,201
Poor
$59,383
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.8%
Exceptional
23.5%

Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 91.5%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 69.4%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and single mother poverty (26.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 25.2%).
Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Poverty
Poverty MetricSri LankanArapaho
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
16.3%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
25.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
17.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
20.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
24.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.7%
Tragic
33.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.4%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.1%

Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 186.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 155.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 136.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.1%).
Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSri LankanArapaho
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
11.0%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
8.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.2%

Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSri LankanArapaho
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
74.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Excellent
37.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
77.1%

Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 62.8%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.7% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.64, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.5%).
Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSri LankanArapaho
Family Households
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
25.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Exceptional
3.64
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
40.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Tragic
47.1%

Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSri LankanArapaho
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.5%
Exceptional
92.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.0%
Exceptional
60.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
26.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
9.4%

Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 60.0%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.2%), ged/equivalency (84.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Education Level
Education Level MetricSri LankanArapaho
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.2%

Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 47.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%).
Sri Lankan vs Arapaho Disability
Disability MetricSri LankanArapaho
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.5%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%