Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States [ 101 - 200 ]

	Zip Code	% Carpool	vs State	vs National
101.	58254, North Dakota	66.3%	35.9%(+30.4)#2	38.2%(+28.1)#101
102.	51010, Iowa	66.3%	37.7%(+28.6)#8	38.2%(+28.1)#102
103.	10017, New York	66.2%	40.9%(+25.3)#4	38.2%(+28.0)#103
104.	08022, New Jersey	66.2%	40.8%(+25.4)#5	38.2%(+28.0)#104
105.	05672, Vermont	66.2%	39.8%(+26.4)#3	38.2%(+28.0)#105
106.	83553, Idaho	66.2%	36.9%(+29.3)#2	38.2%(+28.0)#106
107.	57238, South Dakota	66.2%	37.5%(+28.7)#2	38.2%(+28.0)#107
108.	80829, Colorado	66.1%	36.6%(+29.5)#4	38.2%(+27.9)#108
109.	21919, Maryland	66.1%	39.4%(+26.7)#4	38.2%(+27.9)#109
110.	59027, Montana	66.1%	38.0%(+28.1)#3	38.2%(+27.9)#110
111.	97830, Oregon	66.1%	37.9%(+28.2)#1	38.2%(+27.9)#111
112.	71935, Arkansas	66.1%	37.1%(+29.0)#1	38.2%(+27.9)#112
113.	50611, Iowa	66.1%	37.7%(+28.4)#9	38.2%(+27.9)#113
114.	16683, Pennsylvania	66.1%	38.3%(+27.8)#8	38.2%(+27.9)#114
115.	04497, Maine	66.1%	38.5%(+27.6)#1	38.2%(+27.9)#115
116.	71956, Arkansas	66.0%	37.1%(+28.9)#2	38.2%(+27.8)#116
117.	50435, Iowa	66.0%	37.7%(+28.3)#10	38.2%(+27.8)#117
118.	68746, Nebraska	65.9%	37.5%(+28.4)#6	38.2%(+27.7)#118
119.	59086, Montana	65.8%	38.0%(+27.8)#4	38.2%(+27.6)#119
120.	97050, Oregon	65.8%	37.9%(+27.9)#2	38.2%(+27.6)#120
121.	67758, Kansas	65.7%	37.0%(+28.7)#3	38.2%(+27.5)#121
122.	59041, Montana	65.6%	38.0%(+27.6)#5	38.2%(+27.4)#122
123.	74741, Oklahoma	65.6%	37.2%(+28.4)#5	38.2%(+27.4)#123
124.	92637, California	65.5%	39.3%(+26.2)#4	38.2%(+27.3)#124
125.	76866, Texas	65.5%	37.6%(+27.9)#5	38.2%(+27.3)#125
126.	01264, Massachusetts	65.5%	39.0%(+26.5)#2	38.2%(+27.3)#126
127.	62063, Illinois	65.4%	39.0%(+26.4)#4	38.2%(+27.2)#127
128.	52745, Iowa	65.4%	37.7%(+27.7)#11	38.2%(+27.2)#128
129.	61274, Illinois	65.4%	39.0%(+26.4)#5	38.2%(+27.2)#129
130.	95445, California	65.3%	39.3%(+26.0)#5	38.2%(+27.1)#130
131.	66401, Kansas	65.3%	37.0%(+28.3)#4	38.2%(+27.1)#131
132.	05486, Vermont	65.3%	39.8%(+25.5)#4	38.2%(+27.1)#132
133.	79851, Texas	65.3%	37.6%(+27.7)#6	38.2%(+27.1)#133
134.	51022, Iowa	65.3%	37.7%(+27.6)#12	38.2%(+27.1)#134
135.	45348, Ohio	65.3%	36.5%(+28.8)#2	38.2%(+27.1)#135
136.	95075, California	65.3%	39.3%(+26.0)#6	38.2%(+27.1)#136
137.	56546, Minnesota	65.3%	37.5%(+27.8)#2	38.2%(+27.1)#137
138.	59338, Montana	65.3%	38.0%(+27.3)#6	38.2%(+27.1)#138
139.	38028, Tennessee	65.2%	37.3%(+27.9)#3	38.2%(+27.0)#139
140.	88312, New Mexico	65.2%	38.5%(+26.7)#4	38.2%(+27.0)#140
141.	13063, New York	65.2%	40.9%(+24.3)#5	38.2%(+27.0)#141
142.	03243, New Hampshire	65.2%	38.4%(+26.8)#3	38.2%(+27.0)#142
143.	67651, Kansas	65.2%	37.0%(+28.2)#5	38.2%(+27.0)#143
144.	59522, Montana	65.1%	38.0%(+27.1)#7	38.2%(+26.9)#144
145.	95664, California	65.1%	39.3%(+25.8)#7	38.2%(+26.9)#145
146.	66945, Kansas	65.1%	37.0%(+28.1)#6	38.2%(+26.9)#146
147.	84636, Utah	65.1%	34.8%(+30.3)#1	38.2%(+26.9)#147
148.	32798, Florida	64.9%	39.6%(+25.3)#6	38.2%(+26.7)#148
149.	44802, Ohio	64.9%	36.5%(+28.4)#3	38.2%(+26.7)#149
150.	66024, Kansas	64.8%	37.0%(+27.8)#7	38.2%(+26.6)#150
151.	97859, Oregon	64.7%	37.9%(+26.8)#3	38.2%(+26.5)#151
152.	32163, Florida	64.6%	39.6%(+25.0)#7	38.2%(+26.4)#152
153.	63967, Missouri	64.6%	37.7%(+26.9)#4	38.2%(+26.4)#153
154.	67024, Kansas	64.6%	37.0%(+27.6)#8	38.2%(+26.4)#154
155.	51355, Iowa	64.6%	37.7%(+26.9)#13	38.2%(+26.4)#155
156.	63436, Missouri	64.5%	37.7%(+26.8)#5	38.2%(+26.3)#156
157.	54838, Wisconsin	64.5%	37.5%(+27.0)#3	38.2%(+26.3)#157
158.	02659, Massachusetts	64.5%	39.0%(+25.5)#3	38.2%(+26.3)#158
159.	56121, Minnesota	64.5%	37.5%(+27.0)#3	38.2%(+26.3)#159
160.	84038, Utah	64.5%	34.8%(+29.7)#2	38.2%(+26.3)#160
161.	59416, Montana	64.5%	38.0%(+26.5)#8	38.2%(+26.3)#161
162.	25033, West Virginia	64.4%	38.6%(+25.8)#2	38.2%(+26.2)#162
163.	66753, Kansas	64.4%	37.0%(+27.4)#9	38.2%(+26.2)#163
164.	62972, Illinois	64.4%	39.0%(+25.4)#6	38.2%(+26.2)#164
165.	27843, North Carolina	64.4%	37.5%(+26.9)#3	38.2%(+26.2)#165
166.	15477, Pennsylvania	64.4%	38.3%(+26.1)#9	38.2%(+26.2)#166
167.	83013, Wyoming	64.4%	37.7%(+26.7)#2	38.2%(+26.2)#167
168.	99571, Alaska	64.4%	37.0%(+27.4)#1	38.2%(+26.2)#168
169.	68442, Nebraska	64.4%	37.5%(+26.9)#7	38.2%(+26.2)#169
170.	03862, New Hampshire	64.3%	38.4%(+25.9)#4	38.2%(+26.1)#170
171.	05255, Vermont	64.3%	39.8%(+24.5)#5	38.2%(+26.1)#171
172.	02667, Massachusetts	64.3%	39.0%(+25.3)#4	38.2%(+26.1)#172
173.	27938, North Carolina	64.3%	37.5%(+26.8)#4	38.2%(+26.1)#173
174.	70661, Louisiana	64.3%	37.7%(+26.6)#2	38.2%(+26.1)#174
175.	73062, Oklahoma	64.3%	37.2%(+27.1)#6	38.2%(+26.1)#175
176.	48621, Michigan	64.3%	37.1%(+27.2)#1	38.2%(+26.1)#176
177.	50581, Iowa	64.3%	37.7%(+26.6)#14	38.2%(+26.1)#177
178.	68773, Nebraska	64.3%	37.5%(+26.8)#8	38.2%(+26.1)#178
179.	65040, Missouri	64.2%	37.7%(+26.5)#6	38.2%(+26.0)#179
180.	59003, Montana	64.2%	38.0%(+26.2)#9	38.2%(+26.0)#180
181.	39347, Mississippi	64.2%	37.8%(+26.4)#4	38.2%(+26.0)#181
182.	58535, North Dakota	64.2%	35.9%(+28.3)#3	38.2%(+26.0)#182
183.	36451, Alabama	64.1%	37.5%(+26.6)#3	38.2%(+25.9)#183
184.	38326, Tennessee	64.1%	37.3%(+26.8)#4	38.2%(+25.9)#184
185.	99148, Washington	64.1%	37.6%(+26.5)#2	38.2%(+25.9)#185
186.	65640, Missouri	64.1%	37.7%(+26.4)#7	38.2%(+25.9)#186
187.	36602, Alabama	64.1%	37.5%(+26.6)#4	38.2%(+25.9)#187
188.	57632, South Dakota	64.1%	37.5%(+26.6)#3	38.2%(+25.9)#188
189.	55763, Minnesota	64.1%	37.5%(+26.6)#4	38.2%(+25.9)#189
190.	13695, New York	64.1%	40.9%(+23.2)#6	38.2%(+25.9)#190
191.	66085, Kansas	64.0%	37.0%(+27.0)#10	38.2%(+25.8)#191
192.	15670, Pennsylvania	64.0%	38.3%(+25.7)#10	38.2%(+25.8)#192
193.	49919, Michigan	64.0%	37.1%(+26.9)#2	38.2%(+25.8)#193
194.	28582, North Carolina	63.9%	37.5%(+26.4)#5	38.2%(+25.7)#194
195.	60511, Illinois	63.8%	39.0%(+24.8)#7	38.2%(+25.6)#195
196.	05046, Vermont	63.8%	39.8%(+24.0)#6	38.2%(+25.6)#196
197.	86024, Arizona	63.8%	36.6%(+27.2)#4	38.2%(+25.6)#197
198.	38720, Mississippi	63.8%	37.8%(+26.0)#5	38.2%(+25.6)#198
199.	72923, Arkansas	63.7%	37.1%(+26.6)#3	38.2%(+25.5)#199
200.	87418, New Mexico	63.7%	38.5%(+25.2)#5	38.2%(+25.5)#200

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10