Danish Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Danish
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Danish Receiving Food Stamps
9.0%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,155,016 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 9.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Danes and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Danes influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Danes simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Danes by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Scotland (9.0%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Japan (9.0%, a difference of 0.61%), Norwegian (9.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Danish Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 53.8% | 17.7% |
| Range | 53.7% | 16.3% |
| Mean | 17.1% | 7.9% |
| Median | 15.3% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.2% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 3.7% |
Correlation Details
| Danish Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 356,232,051 | 12.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 69,851,468 | 8.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 24,362,230 | 7.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 8,925,142 | 7.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 3,152,072 | 7.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,991,983 | 7.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 1,462,646 | 7.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 1,658,394 | 6.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 1,150,866 | 5.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 948,760 | 5.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.27% | 774,485 | 5.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 465,215 | 5.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 255,220 | 6.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.80% | 184,294 | 5.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 127,107 | 7.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 198,135 | 5.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 102,262 | 5.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 60,142 | 6.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.27% | 22,018 | 9.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.77% | 35,728 | 7.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.39% | 15,369 | 5.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.76% | 27,914 | 6.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.22% | 22,458 | 8.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.72% | 7,173 | 7.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 4,682 | 8.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.71% | 16,186 | 15.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.37% | 15,371 | 14.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.78% | 9,348 | 17.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 10,973 | 9.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.76% | 5,520 | 12.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 872 | 10.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.71% | 2,202 | 13.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.20% | 1,667 | 12.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.74% | 5,186 | 13.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.44% | 9,242 | 9.4% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.68% | 2,930 | 3.9% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.15% | 1,967 | 13.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.68% | 2,361 | 3.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.19% | 3,762 | 12.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 1,005 | 9.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.19% | 5,766 | 5.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.19% | 2,869 | 8.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.80% | 4,780 | 5.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 222 | 1.8% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 364 | 2.8% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.00% | 288 | 4.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.43% | 2,937 | 6.5% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.22% | 2,048 | 10.7% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.36% | 793 | 12.6% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.66% | 141 | 1.4% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.79% | 3,050 | 6.8% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.46% | 112 | 4.8% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.75% | 2,148 | 10.9% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.53% | 416 | 6.3% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.20% | 407 | 1.5% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.79% | 891 | 2.3% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.50% | 231 | 8.2% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.80% | 746 | 3.6% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.45% | 152 | 1.5% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.59% | 145 | 13.2% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.85% | 104 | 13.0% |