Danish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Danish Single Female Poverty
20.7%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,634,769 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 20.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.90% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Danes and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Danes influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Danes simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Danes by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Danish Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 16.6% |
| Maximum | 53.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.7% | 83.4% |
| Mean | 15.1% | 35.4% |
| Median | 13.6% | 28.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 40.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 18.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 18.8% |
Correlation Details
| Danish Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 351,448,614 | 22.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 67,033,830 | 18.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 23,069,841 | 18.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 8,461,768 | 20.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 2,910,035 | 21.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,746,445 | 19.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 1,310,647 | 20.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 1,563,964 | 20.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 1,103,207 | 20.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.72% | 896,780 | 19.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 747,858 | 16.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.78% | 409,608 | 21.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 217,172 | 24.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81% | 153,144 | 25.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 105,787 | 27.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 186,717 | 19.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 37,523 | 34.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.77% | 47,444 | 30.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 13,182 | 37.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 29,315 | 38.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.41% | 9,737 | 21.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.77% | 19,067 | 27.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 20,591 | 29.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.77% | 3,015 | 49.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 3,081 | 30.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 12,733 | 24.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.39% | 13,805 | 23.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 7,988 | 42.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.36% | 10,756 | 39.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.42% | 707 | 76.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.64% | 1,068 | 85.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.16% | 427 | 40.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.74% | 4,372 | 27.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 9,049 | 24.4% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.68% | 2,336 | 22.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.05% | 770 | 50.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.61% | 1,585 | 34.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.29% | 1,068 | 69.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 95 | 22.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.16% | 4,802 | 31.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.28% | 1,762 | 19.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.86% | 970 | 33.2% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 222 | 66.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 364 | 66.7% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.00% | 284 | 66.7% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.43% | 2,937 | 23.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.22% | 2,048 | 31.4% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.36% | 793 | 100.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.79% | 2,289 | 27.4% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.46% | 112 | 33.3% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.72% | 1,292 | 33.4% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.82% | 784 | 40.0% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.83% | 875 | 58.3% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.85% | 104 | 60.0% |