Chippewa vs Swiss Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Swiss
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Swiss
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Swiss Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,133,438 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Swiss.
Chippewa vs Swiss Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,071, a difference of 22.8%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $85,681, a difference of 21.5%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $44,076, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $37,904, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,493, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,621, a difference of 14.4%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Swiss |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Good $44,076 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Good $104,396 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Average $85,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Average $46,315 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Good $55,731 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $37,904 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Poor $51,493 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Good $95,511 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Good $103,071 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Good $61,621 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 30.0% |
Chippewa vs Swiss Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 51.4%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Swiss |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chippewa vs Swiss Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 68.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Swiss |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chippewa vs Swiss Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Swiss |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 43.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Average 82.8% |
Chippewa vs Swiss Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Swiss |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Excellent 30.5% |
Chippewa vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 6.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Swiss |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 61.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Chippewa vs Swiss Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Swiss |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Average 65.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Average 59.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Fair 37.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chippewa vs Swiss Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.7%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Swiss |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |