Zimbabwean vs Swiss Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Swiss
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Swiss
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Swiss Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,469,195 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 49.3 Swiss.
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 13.9%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $37,904, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,621, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,493, a difference of 0.46%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,731, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $95,511, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Good $44,076 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Good $104,396 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Average $85,681 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Average $46,315 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Good $55,731 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $37,904 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Poor $51,493 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Good $95,511 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Good $103,071 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Good $61,621 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 30.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 43.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Average 82.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Excellent 30.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 61.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.2%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Average 65.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Average 59.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Fair 37.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Excellent 2.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Swiss Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.6%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Swiss |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |