Celtic vs New Zealander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
New Zealander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
New Zealanders
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
New Zealander Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,599,633 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.346% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 345.5 New Zealanders.
Celtic vs New Zealander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $50,575, a difference of 15.9%), median household income ($83,193 compared to $95,146, a difference of 14.4%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $115,230, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.6%), and median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $42,446, a difference of 10.9%).
Income Metric | Celtic | New Zealander |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Exceptional $50,575 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Exceptional $115,230 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Exceptional $95,146 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Exceptional $51,246 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Exceptional $61,199 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Exceptional $42,446 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Exceptional $53,294 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Exceptional $105,085 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Exceptional $111,286 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Exceptional $67,333 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 27.7% |
Celtic vs New Zealander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Poverty Metric | Celtic | New Zealander |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Good 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Poor 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Celtic vs New Zealander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.49%).
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | New Zealander |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Celtic vs New Zealander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | New Zealander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Fair 82.6% |
Celtic vs New Zealander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.4%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.23%), currently married (47.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | New Zealander |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 62.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Excellent 30.3% |
Celtic vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | New Zealander |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Good 6.5% |
Celtic vs New Zealander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Celtic | New Zealander |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 51.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Celtic vs New Zealander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Disability Metric | Celtic | New Zealander |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |