Chippewa vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,118,663 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.989. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 10.0 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $50,575, a difference of 38.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $95,146, a difference of 34.9%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $115,230, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,294, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $42,446, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 40.6%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.3%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 86.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.0%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 71.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%).