Filipino vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Filipinos

Luxembourgers

Exceptional
Excellent
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Filipino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,894,133 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 20.8 Luxembourgers.
Filipino Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Filipino vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $86,418, a difference of 33.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $97,237, a difference of 32.4%), and median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $56,300, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $50,379, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $39,891, a difference of 24.1%).
Filipino vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricFilipinoLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$59,066
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$138,397
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$115,509
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$61,197
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,224
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,508
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,740
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,723
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$134,910
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$76,686
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
27.4%

Filipino vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 28.5%), single male poverty (10.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and poverty (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Filipino vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricFilipinoLuxembourger
Poverty
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.0%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.3%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Filipino vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%).
Filipino vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFilipinoLuxembourger
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Filipino vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 42.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Filipino vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFilipinoLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.4%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
85.0%

Filipino vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Filipino vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFilipinoLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
29.4%

Filipino vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 94.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Filipino vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFilipinoLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Filipino vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.3%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 63.8%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (91.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Filipino vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricFilipinoLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.5%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
75.5%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
52.7%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
23.4%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.4%
Excellent
1.9%

Filipino vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Filipino vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricFilipinoLuxembourger
Disability
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%