Chinese vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,551,221 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 110.7 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,967, a difference of 27.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,379, a difference of 15.4%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,418, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,663, a difference of 0.95%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,300, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,640, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 29.2%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 6.4%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and male poverty (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.1%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.46%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.8%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.9%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.8%).