Fijian vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,121,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 37.5 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $34,584, a difference of 45.0%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $40,550, a difference of 40.0%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $54,644, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $32,500, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($40,193 compared to $36,876, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 82.2%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 81.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 36.6%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 43.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 44.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 82.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 49.4%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.3%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.9%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and bachelor's degree (28.7% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.5% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.8%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 40.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.0%).