Ute vs Ghanaian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Ghanaian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Ghanaians
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Ghanaian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,052,408 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 17.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Ghanaian |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 41.8% |
| Range | 90.4% | 40.7% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 16.7% |
| Median | 25.0% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |