Latvian vs Fijian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Fijian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Fijians
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Fijian Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,907,739 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.914. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.246% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 246.1 Fijians.
Latvian vs Fijian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,690, a difference of 43.5%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $45,607, a difference of 39.2%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $87,387, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,132, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $56,768, a difference of 18.6%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.7%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Fijian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $36,690 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Tragic $87,387 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Tragic $74,205 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $40,193 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $45,607 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Tragic $35,114 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $50,132 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Tragic $79,956 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Tragic $85,187 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Tragic $56,768 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Latvian vs Fijian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.1%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Fijian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 18.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Tragic 31.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Latvian vs Fijian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Fijian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 3.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Latvian vs Fijian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Fijian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 80.2% |
Latvian vs Fijian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.0%), currently married (48.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Fijian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Fair 46.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.36 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Fair 32.3% |
Latvian vs Fijian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.22%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Fijian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 90.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Latvian vs Fijian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 128.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 113.4%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Fijian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 94.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 91.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 88.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 86.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Tragic 81.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Tragic 57.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 51.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 37.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 28.7% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 10.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.1% |
Latvian vs Fijian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.3%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Fijian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |