Crow vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,434,842 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.844. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.240% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 240.4 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.2%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $74,205, a difference of 16.5%), and per capita income ($31,729 compared to $36,690, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $35,114, a difference of 0.43%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $40,193, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $50,132, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 93.1%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 68.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 297.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 285.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 265.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 25.1%), single father households (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.96%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.49%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 30.9%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.47%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.5%).