Ute vs Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Ute
Choctaw
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Ute
Choctaw
80.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Choctaw In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,662,248 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 80.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,623,280 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 81.0%, a difference of 0.20%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Choctaw |
Minimum | 16.2% | 48.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 83.8% | 51.4% |
Mean | 79.2% | 77.3% |
Median | 81.7% | 77.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.9% | 69.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 82.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.1% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.0% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Choctaw by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and Houma (81.2%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Houma (81.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |