Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Choctaw
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,531,168 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Choctaw.
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 29.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $78,168, a difference of 8.3%), and median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $47,729, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($35,720 compared to $35,999, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $33,775, a difference of 1.6%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $40,270, a difference of 2.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 28.1% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 34.7%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.42%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.5%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 78.2% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (39.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 17.8%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.47%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 36.9% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 35.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 75.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 6.9%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Choctaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |