Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Bhutanese
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 365,076,656 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Bhutanese.
Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,295 compared to $119,800, a difference of 35.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $117,750, a difference of 34.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $109,520, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.8%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $43,648, a difference of 22.3%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 71.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 69.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 24.3%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.2%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.40 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 92.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 64.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Bhutanese |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |