Ute vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Bhutanese
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Bhutanese
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,147,907 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 56.1%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 70.6% | 33.8% |
| Range | 64.1% | 31.9% |
| Mean | 32.1% | 11.5% |
| Median | 23.3% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Bolivian (11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Asian (11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Greece (11.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.6% |