Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City, UT

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Salt Lake City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City

55.7%
80.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City, UT

Zip Code % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. 84113 80.9% 68.4% (+12.5)#10 66.9% (+14.0)#2,056
2. 84104 77.5% 68.4% (+9.07)#22 66.9% (+10.6)#3,331
3. 84118 77.2% 68.4% (+8.82)#23 66.9% (+10.4)#3,437
4. 84129 75.9% 68.4% (+7.51)#30 66.9% (+9.05)#4,215
5. 84116 74.2% 68.4% (+5.77)#39 66.9% (+7.31)#5,591
6. 84112 72.7% 68.4% (+4.25)#50 66.9% (+5.78)#7,100
7. 84123 71.9% 68.4% (+3.44)#59 66.9% (+4.98)#7,970
8. 84115 69.5% 68.4% (+1.06)#81 66.9% (+2.60)#11,062
9. 84121 67.5% 68.4% (-0.891)#110 66.9% (+0.649)#13,692
10. 84107 67.1% 68.4% (-1.38)#118 66.9% (+0.164)#14,292
11. 84111 66.5% 68.4% (-1.91)#125 66.9% (-0.367)#15,021
12. 84101 64.9% 68.4% (-3.52)#143 66.9% (-1.98)#17,110
13. 84117 64.5% 68.4% (-3.88)#152 66.9% (-2.34)#17,552
14. 84124 62.8% 68.4% (-5.58)#171 66.9% (-4.04)#19,523
15. 84103 61.1% 68.4% (-7.30)#196 66.9% (-5.76)#21,336
16. 84106 60.4% 68.4% (-7.99)#202 66.9% (-6.45)#22,007
17. 84105 59.0% 68.4% (-9.41)#213 66.9% (-7.87)#23,253
18. 84102 58.4% 68.4% (-10.1)#218 66.9% (-8.53)#23,802
19. 84109 56.7% 68.4% (-11.7)#226 66.9% (-10.2)#24,994
20. 84108 55.7% 68.4% (-12.8)#235 66.9% (-11.2)#25,708

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City, UT?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City, UT are:
#1
80.9%
#2
77.5%
#3
77.2%
#4
75.9%
#5
74.2%
#6
72.7%
#7
71.9%
#8
69.5%
#9
67.5%
#10
67.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City, UT?
84113 has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City, UT with 80.9%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City, UT?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Salt Lake City is 64.5%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in Utah?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Utah is 68.4%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.