Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City, UT

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Salt Lake City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City

100.0%
1.3%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City, UT

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 84109 1.3% 17.7% (-16.4)#1 24.1% (-22.8)#73
2. 84124 6.1% 17.7% (-11.6)#9 24.1% (-17.9)#1,461
3. 84121 6.3% 17.7% (-11.4)#10 24.1% (-17.8)#1,549
4. 84107 8.8% 17.7% (-8.94)#18 24.1% (-15.3)#2,738
5. 84105 8.8% 17.7% (-8.90)#19 24.1% (-15.3)#2,755
6. 84106 11.6% 17.7% (-6.09)#37 24.1% (-12.5)#4,299
7. 84108 12.4% 17.7% (-5.28)#43 24.1% (-11.6)#4,741
8. 84103 14.3% 17.7% (-3.40)#49 24.1% (-9.77)#5,904
9. 84111 15.5% 17.7% (-2.25)#53 24.1% (-8.62)#6,551
10. 84117 17.3% 17.7% (-0.402)#65 24.1% (-6.77)#7,622
11. 84102 18.4% 17.7% (+0.678)#71 24.1% (-5.69)#8,276
12. 84115 19.0% 17.7% (+1.25)#75 24.1% (-5.11)#8,611
13. 84129 19.4% 17.7% (+1.71)#77 24.1% (-4.65)#8,861
14. 84118 20.5% 17.7% (+2.77)#82 24.1% (-3.59)#9,491
15. 84104 21.2% 17.7% (+3.48)#87 24.1% (-2.88)#9,847
16. 84116 22.0% 17.7% (+4.31)#93 24.1% (-2.05)#10,312
17. 84123 25.0% 17.7% (+7.25)#109 24.1% (+0.884)#11,919
18. 84101 42.9% 17.7% (+25.2)#143 24.1% (+18.8)#19,205
19. 84112 100.0% 17.7% (+82.3)#169 24.1% (+75.9)#23,440

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City, UT?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City, UT are:
#1
1.3%
#2
6.1%
#3
6.3%
#4
8.8%
#5
8.8%
#6
11.6%
#7
12.4%
#8
14.3%
#9
15.5%
#10
17.3%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City, UT?
84109 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City, UT with 1.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City, UT?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Salt Lake City is 16.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Utah?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Utah is 17.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.