Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City, UT

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Salt Lake City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City

21.8%
44.5%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City, UT

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 84107 44.5% 26.1% (+18.4)#26 33.4% (+11.1)#6,568
2. 84115 44.1% 26.1% (+18.0)#28 33.4% (+10.7)#6,764
3. 84118 43.2% 26.1% (+17.1)#35 33.4% (+9.80)#7,101
4. 84116 39.5% 26.1% (+13.4)#44 33.4% (+6.10)#8,564
5. 84117 38.6% 26.1% (+12.5)#47 33.4% (+5.20)#8,974
6. 84106 38.3% 26.1% (+12.2)#50 33.4% (+4.90)#9,113
7. 84103 37.3% 26.1% (+11.2)#54 33.4% (+3.90)#9,555
8. 84129 36.4% 26.1% (+10.3)#56 33.4% (+3.00)#9,915
9. 84101 36.4% 26.1% (+10.3)#58 33.4% (+3.00)#9,939
10. 84104 33.1% 26.1% (+7.00)#73 33.4% (-0.300)#11,333
11. 84109 32.8% 26.1% (+6.70)#75 33.4% (-0.600)#11,449
12. 84124 30.9% 26.1% (+4.80)#80 33.4% (-2.50)#12,216
13. 84105 30.7% 26.1% (+4.60)#81 33.4% (-2.70)#12,347
14. 84123 28.4% 26.1% (+2.30)#89 33.4% (-5.00)#13,212
15. 84102 26.5% 26.1% (+0.400)#98 33.4% (-6.90)#13,874
16. 84111 26.0% 26.1% (-0.100)#100 33.4% (-7.40)#13,991
17. 84108 23.0% 26.1% (-3.10)#114 33.4% (-10.4)#14,885
18. 84113 22.3% 26.1% (-3.80)#121 33.4% (-11.1)#15,184
19. 84121 21.8% 26.1% (-4.30)#124 33.4% (-11.6)#15,361
20. 84112 21.8% 26.1% (-4.30)#125 33.4% (-11.6)#15,412

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City, UT?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City, UT are:
#1
44.5%
#2
44.1%
#3
43.2%
#4
39.5%
#5
38.6%
#6
38.3%
#7
37.3%
#8
36.4%
#9
36.4%
#10
33.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City, UT?
84107 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City, UT with 44.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City, UT?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Salt Lake City is 29.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Utah?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Utah is 26.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.