Houma vs Eastern European Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Houma
Eastern European
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Houma
Eastern Europeans
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Eastern European Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,736,486 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,266,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 55.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Eastern European |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 34.9% | 53.8% |
| Range | 32.6% | 53.0% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 8.3% |
| Median | 6.5% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Houma by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), Seminole (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.1%, a difference of 0.57%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |