Ute vs Yakama Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Yakama
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Yakama
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Yakama Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%, a difference of 0.42%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Yakama |
Minimum | 18.0% | 17.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 82.0% | 82.9% |
Mean | 43.7% | 42.1% |
Median | 37.5% | 38.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.4% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.8% | 52.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 26.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 22.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Yakama by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and Apache (27.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |