Chickasaw vs Swedish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Swedish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Swedes
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Swedish Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,116,684 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Swedes.
Chickasaw vs Swedish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $106,377, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $99,136, a difference of 27.2%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $108,499, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,421, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,736, a difference of 16.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Swedish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $45,750 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $108,499 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $88,524 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,851 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $57,445 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Fair $39,421 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Excellent $52,986 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $99,136 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $106,377 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,736 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 29.4% |
Chickasaw vs Swedish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 52.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 50.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.6%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 21.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Swedish |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Average 20.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Chickasaw vs Swedish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Swedish |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw vs Swedish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Swedish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 44.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 78.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Chickasaw vs Swedish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Swedish |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 50.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.6% |
Chickasaw vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Swedish |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chickasaw vs Swedish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Swedish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 92.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Good 39.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Swedish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Swedish |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |