Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Scandinavian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Scandinavians
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Scandinavian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,632,166 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.727. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 8.3 Scandinavians.
Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $95,596, a difference of 25.3%), per capita income ($54,264 compared to $43,848, a difference of 23.7%), and median female earnings ($46,972 compared to $38,306, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $52,654, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $61,586, a difference of 12.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Scandinavian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Average $43,848 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Good $104,410 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Good $86,073 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Average $46,433 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Good $55,527 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $38,306 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Good $52,654 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Good $95,596 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Good $102,969 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Good $61,586 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Tragic 29.1% |
Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.43%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Scandinavian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Fair 20.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Scandinavian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 40.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Scandinavian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Fair 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.9%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Scandinavian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 49.6% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 116.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 9.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Scandinavian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 62.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 23.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.8%), doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.4%), and professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Scandinavian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Exceptional 67.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Excellent 61.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Good 46.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Average 37.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Fair 14.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Average 1.8% |
Immigrants from China vs Scandinavian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.9%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Scandinavian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Average 23.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |