Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Malaysian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from China
Malaysians
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Malaysian Integration in Immigrants from China Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,987,706 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from China communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from China corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Malaysians.
Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,264 compared to $39,194, a difference of 38.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,756 compared to $88,291, a difference of 35.6%), and median male earnings ($67,353 compared to $50,772, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,931 compared to $51,615, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,174 compared to $58,244, a difference of 18.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from China | Malaysian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,264 | Tragic $39,194 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,540 | Tragic $95,230 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $105,335 | Tragic $81,064 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,638 | Tragic $43,844 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,353 | Tragic $50,772 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,972 | Tragic $37,298 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,931 | Poor $51,615 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $119,756 | Tragic $88,291 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $122,178 | Tragic $94,517 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,174 | Tragic $58,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.7% | Excellent 25.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 35.4%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from China | Malaysian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Good 19.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.1% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.1% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from China | Malaysian |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.1% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from China | Malaysian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Fair 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 39.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 71.1% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 82.0% |
Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 47.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 44.4%), and births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from China | Malaysian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.7% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Poor 45.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 33.9% |
Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 96.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from China | Malaysian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 112.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 98.3%), and master's degree (21.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.21%), 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from China | Malaysian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 93.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 92.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 89.2% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 87.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 83.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.9% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.5% | Tragic 41.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 3.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from China vs Malaysian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from China and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 43.4%), disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from China | Malaysian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.96% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |