Norwegian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,084,327 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,480 compared to $49,448, a difference of 11.2%), median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $61,228, a difference of 9.4%), and median household income ($86,084 compared to $93,852, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.73%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $53,552, a difference of 0.80%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $65,209, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.9%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (14.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.0%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 31.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.4%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.0%).