Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Jordanians

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Exceptional
Good
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Jordanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,433,553 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Immigrants from Hong Kong.
Jordanian Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $128,140, a difference of 29.2%), per capita income ($45,605 compared to $56,709, a difference of 24.3%), and median household income ($91,794 compared to $111,519, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $71,567, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $127,500, a difference of 16.6%).
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Income
Income MetricJordanianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,605
Exceptional
$56,709
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,865
Exceptional
$131,067
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,794
Exceptional
$111,519
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,632
Exceptional
$59,433
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,500
Exceptional
$70,146
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,464
Exceptional
$49,818
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,796
Exceptional
$62,083
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,186
Exceptional
$128,140
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$109,376
Exceptional
$127,500
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,313
Exceptional
$71,567
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Good
25.5%

Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 25.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.4%).
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Poverty
Poverty MetricJordanianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
17.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
16.5%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
24.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricJordanianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.83%).
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricJordanianImmigrants from Hong Kong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.4%
Tragic
30.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
71.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.6%

Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.1%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.47%), family households (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricJordanianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
23.6%

Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 32.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricJordanianImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.6%
Tragic
52.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Fair
19.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.5%

Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.4%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.1%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.2% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.73%).
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Education Level
Education Level MetricJordanianImmigrants from Hong Kong
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.4%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Tragic
94.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Average
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.0%
Exceptional
71.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.2%
Exceptional
55.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
48.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.8%

Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.90%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.8%).
Jordanian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Disability
Disability MetricJordanianImmigrants from Hong Kong
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
19.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%