Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Hawaiian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Hawaiians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hawaiian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,584,923 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Hawaiians.
Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,729, a difference of 21.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,920, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,778, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,488, a difference of 5.6%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,673, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,403, a difference of 8.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Hawaiian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,403 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Poor $98,869 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $84,729 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,673 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $50,488 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,497 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Excellent $53,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $90,722 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Fair $98,778 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $64,920 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Excellent 24.9% |
Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 30.7%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Hawaiian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Average 9.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Fair 13.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Poor 14.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Average 29.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Hawaiian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Average 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Hawaiian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.5% |
Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.41, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Hawaiian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 33.2% |
Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Hawaiian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 24.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Hawaiian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Poor 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Hawaiian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |