Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Filipinos

Good
Exceptional
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Filipino Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,996,287 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.315% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 315.4 Filipinos.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Filipino Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 16.3%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $57,740, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $76,686, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $128,723, a difference of 0.45%), median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $49,508, a difference of 0.63%), and median earnings ($59,433 compared to $61,197, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongFilipino
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$59,066
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Exceptional
$138,397
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Exceptional
$115,509
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Exceptional
$61,197
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Exceptional
$74,224
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Exceptional
$49,508
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Exceptional
$57,740
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Exceptional
$128,723
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Exceptional
$134,910
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Exceptional
$76,686
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
29.7%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 0.23%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongFilipino
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
24.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongFilipino
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongFilipino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
31.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Tragic
71.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.36%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongFilipino
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
51.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
23.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.0%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongFilipino
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.9%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongFilipino
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
89.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
75.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
71.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
59.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
52.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
23.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
7.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
3.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Filipino Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongFilipino
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%