Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,542,801 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 3.8 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,523, a difference of 20.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $107,269, a difference of 19.5%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $95,930, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $67,926, a difference of 5.4%), wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $51,875, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 24.7%), single female poverty (16.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.7%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.73%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 23.8%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.10, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 66.8%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.0% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.0%).