Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Alaskan Athabascans

Fair
Fair
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,053,462 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.874. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.377% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 377.3 Alaskan Athabascans.
Chippewa Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $62,330, a difference of 15.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $88,446, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,713, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,163, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $49,748, a difference of 7.3%).
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
Income MetricChippewaAlaskan Athabascan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Tragic
$39,163
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Tragic
$94,429
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Tragic
$76,383
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Tragic
$43,393
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Tragic
$49,748
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Tragic
$37,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Fair
$51,713
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Tragic
$88,446
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Excellent
$62,330
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Average
25.8%

Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and female poverty (16.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaAlaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
23.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.7%

Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 70.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 54.3%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaAlaskan Athabascan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Fair
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
11.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.77%).
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaAlaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
45.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Tragic
81.8%

Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (62.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.0%).
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaAlaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
37.7%

Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 65.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaAlaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Average
55.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.1%

Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.5%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaAlaskan Athabascan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
61.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.47%), disability (14.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
Disability MetricChippewaAlaskan Athabascan
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
14.9%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
32.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
54.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.5%