Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Alaskan Athabascan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Alaskan Athabascans
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,053,462 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.874. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.377% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 377.3 Alaskan Athabascans.
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $62,330, a difference of 15.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $88,446, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,713, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $39,163, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $49,748, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Alaskan Athabascan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $39,163 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $94,429 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $76,383 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $43,393 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $49,748 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $37,905 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Fair $51,713 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $88,446 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $90,951 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Excellent $62,330 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Average 25.8% |
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and female poverty (16.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Alaskan Athabascan |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 23.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 70.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 54.3%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Alaskan Athabascan |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Fair 17.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 8.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 8.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 11.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.77%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Alaskan Athabascan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 45.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 81.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.8% |
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (3.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (62.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Alaskan Athabascan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 61.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 43.6% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 37.7% |
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 65.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Alaskan Athabascan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 86.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Average 55.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.5%), associate's degree (40.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Alaskan Athabascan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Fair 85.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 61.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 36.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chippewa vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.47%), disability (14.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Alaskan Athabascan |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 32.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 54.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.5% |