Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore, MD

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Baltimore
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore

19.6%
56.1%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore, MD

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 21215 56.1% 32.8% (+23.3)#27 33.4% (+22.7)#2,541
2. 21209 49.6% 32.8% (+16.8)#59 33.4% (+16.2)#4,687
3. 21217 41.5% 32.8% (+8.70)#91 33.4% (+8.10)#7,749
4. 21213 41.4% 32.8% (+8.60)#93 33.4% (+8.00)#7,804
5. 21214 41.4% 32.8% (+8.60)#94 33.4% (+8.00)#7,810
6. 21223 39.8% 32.8% (+7.00)#101 33.4% (+6.40)#8,447
7. 21224 39.7% 32.8% (+6.90)#103 33.4% (+6.30)#8,480
8. 21202 37.0% 32.8% (+4.20)#120 33.4% (+3.60)#9,674
9. 21211 36.4% 32.8% (+3.60)#126 33.4% (+3.00)#9,935
10. 21205 35.1% 32.8% (+2.30)#131 33.4% (+1.70)#10,500
11. 21230 33.3% 32.8% (+0.500)#138 33.4% (-0.100)#11,257
12. 21201 31.7% 32.8% (-1.10)#144 33.4% (-1.70)#11,914
13. 21229 31.5% 32.8% (-1.30)#145 33.4% (-1.90)#11,983
14. 21231 31.3% 32.8% (-1.50)#148 33.4% (-2.10)#12,085
15. 21239 29.6% 32.8% (-3.20)#156 33.4% (-3.80)#12,760
16. 21218 26.6% 32.8% (-6.20)#173 33.4% (-6.80)#13,821
17. 21206 26.2% 32.8% (-6.60)#175 33.4% (-7.20)#13,947
18. 21216 24.8% 32.8% (-8.00)#188 33.4% (-8.60)#14,331
19. 21212 22.2% 32.8% (-10.6)#197 33.4% (-11.2)#15,196
20. 21210 21.8% 32.8% (-11.0)#202 33.4% (-11.6)#15,384
21. 21250 20.7% 32.8% (-12.1)#215 33.4% (-12.7)#15,993
22. 21251 19.6% 32.8% (-13.2)#225 33.4% (-13.8)#16,460

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore, MD?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore, MD are:
#1
56.1%
#2
49.6%
#3
41.5%
#4
41.4%
#5
41.4%
#6
39.8%
#7
39.7%
#8
37.0%
#9
36.4%
#10
35.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore, MD?
21215 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore, MD with 56.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore, MD?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Baltimore is 32.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Maryland?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Maryland is 32.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.