Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore, MD

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCape VerdeanCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Baltimore
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore

22.1%
88.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore, MD

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 21201 88.9% 32.5% (+56.3)#14 35.2% (+53.7)#496
2. 21202 77.1% 32.5% (+44.5)#16 35.2% (+41.9)#771
3. 21217 68.4% 32.5% (+35.9)#18 35.2% (+33.2)#1,150
4. 21223 66.7% 32.5% (+34.1)#20 35.2% (+31.5)#1,251
5. 21205 65.2% 32.5% (+32.7)#23 35.2% (+30.0)#1,368
6. 21231 65.0% 32.5% (+32.5)#24 35.2% (+29.8)#1,380
7. 21218 51.3% 32.5% (+18.8)#40 35.2% (+16.1)#2,875
8. 21216 51.2% 32.5% (+18.7)#41 35.2% (+16.0)#2,890
9. 21230 49.2% 32.5% (+16.7)#44 35.2% (+14.0)#3,229
10. 21211 46.1% 32.5% (+13.6)#54 35.2% (+10.9)#3,814
11. 21215 45.6% 32.5% (+13.1)#55 35.2% (+10.5)#3,919
12. 21206 45.2% 32.5% (+12.6)#57 35.2% (+9.98)#4,018
13. 21229 45.0% 32.5% (+12.5)#58 35.2% (+9.83)#4,045
14. 21213 44.9% 32.5% (+12.4)#60 35.2% (+9.70)#4,076
15. 21239 43.7% 32.5% (+11.1)#65 35.2% (+8.49)#4,401
16. 21209 42.7% 32.5% (+10.2)#68 35.2% (+7.54)#4,648
17. 21224 38.8% 32.5% (+6.31)#80 35.2% (+3.66)#5,780
18. 21210 38.0% 32.5% (+5.45)#85 35.2% (+2.79)#6,106
19. 21212 31.2% 32.5% (-1.32)#132 35.2% (-3.98)#9,320
20. 21214 22.1% 32.5% (-10.4)#189 35.2% (-13.1)#16,251

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore, MD?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore, MD are:
#1
88.9%
#2
77.1%
#3
68.4%
#4
66.7%
#5
65.2%
#6
65.0%
#7
51.3%
#8
51.2%
#9
49.2%
#10
46.1%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore, MD?
21201 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore, MD with 88.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore, MD?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Baltimore is 52.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Maryland?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Maryland is 32.5%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.