Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago, IL
RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS
Lowest Renter-Occupied
Chicago
Compare Zip Codes
Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago
75.5%
15.1%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago, IL
| Zip Code | % Renter-Occupied | vs State | vs National | |
| 1. | 60652 | 15.1% | 33.3% (-18.2)#431 | 35.2% (-20.1)#8,051 |
| 2. | 60655 | 15.5% | 33.3% (-17.8)#452 | 35.2% (-19.7)#8,439 |
| 3. | 60646 | 19.4% | 33.3% (-13.9)#642 | 35.2% (-15.7)#12,357 |
| 4. | 60638 | 21.1% | 33.3% (-12.2)#727 | 35.2% (-14.1)#13,935 |
| 5. | 60643 | 25.6% | 33.3% (-7.69)#921 | 35.2% (-9.54)#18,003 |
| 6. | 60631 | 25.7% | 33.3% (-7.65)#924 | 35.2% (-9.51)#18,027 |
| 7. | 60634 | 26.1% | 33.3% (-7.25)#936 | 35.2% (-9.11)#18,338 |
| 8. | 60603 | 32.0% | 33.3% (-1.28)#1,098 | 35.2% (-3.14)#22,283 |
| 9. | 60630 | 32.4% | 33.3% (-0.909)#1,106 | 35.2% (-2.77)#22,479 |
| 10. | 60633 | 36.0% | 33.3% (+2.71)#1,157 | 35.2% (+0.850)#24,220 |
| 11. | 60656 | 38.2% | 33.3% (+4.82)#1,186 | 35.2% (+2.97)#25,062 |
| 12. | 60629 | 40.9% | 33.3% (+7.61)#1,211 | 35.2% (+5.75)#25,964 |
| 13. | 60617 | 42.7% | 33.3% (+9.34)#1,224 | 35.2% (+7.48)#26,436 |
| 14. | 60602 | 42.9% | 33.3% (+9.62)#1,230 | 35.2% (+7.77)#26,517 |
| 15. | 60628 | 43.9% | 33.3% (+10.6)#1,235 | 35.2% (+8.75)#26,765 |
| 16. | 60632 | 44.1% | 33.3% (+10.8)#1,237 | 35.2% (+8.92)#26,815 |
| 17. | 60641 | 46.3% | 33.3% (+13.0)#1,252 | 35.2% (+11.1)#27,332 |
| 18. | 60645 | 48.9% | 33.3% (+15.5)#1,264 | 35.2% (+13.7)#27,808 |
| 19. | 60618 | 49.5% | 33.3% (+16.2)#1,265 | 35.2% (+14.3)#27,924 |
| 20. | 60636 | 49.9% | 33.3% (+16.6)#1,267 | 35.2% (+14.7)#27,996 |
| 21. | 60620 | 51.4% | 33.3% (+18.1)#1,270 | 35.2% (+16.3)#28,247 |
| 22. | 60639 | 52.5% | 33.3% (+19.2)#1,273 | 35.2% (+17.3)#28,402 |
| 23. | 60607 | 54.1% | 33.3% (+20.8)#1,275 | 35.2% (+19.0)#28,652 |
| 24. | 60659 | 54.5% | 33.3% (+21.2)#1,276 | 35.2% (+19.3)#28,693 |
| 25. | 60614 | 54.8% | 33.3% (+21.5)#1,277 | 35.2% (+19.6)#28,741 |
| 26. | 60651 | 55.5% | 33.3% (+22.1)#1,278 | 35.2% (+20.3)#28,835 |
| 27. | 60619 | 56.4% | 33.3% (+23.1)#1,281 | 35.2% (+21.2)#28,940 |
| 28. | 60611 | 56.6% | 33.3% (+23.2)#1,282 | 35.2% (+21.4)#28,950 |
| 29. | 60605 | 57.3% | 33.3% (+24.0)#1,285 | 35.2% (+22.1)#29,034 |
| 30. | 60622 | 58.3% | 33.3% (+25.0)#1,288 | 35.2% (+23.1)#29,136 |
| 31. | 60625 | 60.1% | 33.3% (+26.7)#1,289 | 35.2% (+24.9)#29,305 |
| 32. | 60609 | 60.4% | 33.3% (+27.0)#1,290 | 35.2% (+25.2)#29,336 |
| 33. | 60608 | 60.5% | 33.3% (+27.2)#1,291 | 35.2% (+25.3)#29,345 |
| 34. | 60647 | 61.5% | 33.3% (+28.2)#1,295 | 35.2% (+26.3)#29,428 |
| 35. | 60616 | 62.1% | 33.3% (+28.7)#1,297 | 35.2% (+26.9)#29,476 |
| 36. | 60623 | 62.2% | 33.3% (+28.9)#1,299 | 35.2% (+27.1)#29,490 |
| 37. | 60657 | 62.3% | 33.3% (+28.9)#1,300 | 35.2% (+27.1)#29,492 |
| 38. | 60604 | 62.4% | 33.3% (+29.1)#1,301 | 35.2% (+27.2)#29,502 |
| 39. | 60610 | 62.5% | 33.3% (+29.2)#1,303 | 35.2% (+27.3)#29,512 |
| 40. | 60613 | 62.6% | 33.3% (+29.3)#1,304 | 35.2% (+27.4)#29,522 |
| 41. | 60660 | 63.3% | 33.3% (+30.0)#1,305 | 35.2% (+28.2)#29,578 |
| 42. | 60654 | 65.3% | 33.3% (+31.9)#1,308 | 35.2% (+30.1)#29,738 |
| 43. | 60642 | 66.5% | 33.3% (+33.1)#1,310 | 35.2% (+31.3)#29,832 |
| 44. | 60606 | 67.0% | 33.3% (+33.7)#1,311 | 35.2% (+31.8)#29,865 |
| 45. | 60612 | 67.7% | 33.3% (+34.4)#1,313 | 35.2% (+32.5)#29,903 |
| 46. | 60640 | 68.2% | 33.3% (+34.9)#1,314 | 35.2% (+33.0)#29,937 |
| 47. | 60661 | 68.6% | 33.3% (+35.3)#1,315 | 35.2% (+33.5)#29,966 |
| 48. | 60615 | 68.6% | 33.3% (+35.3)#1,316 | 35.2% (+33.5)#29,969 |
| 49. | 60601 | 69.5% | 33.3% (+36.2)#1,317 | 35.2% (+34.3)#30,018 |
| 50. | 60653 | 70.5% | 33.3% (+37.2)#1,320 | 35.2% (+35.3)#30,059 |
| 51. | 60626 | 70.9% | 33.3% (+37.6)#1,322 | 35.2% (+35.7)#30,085 |
| 52. | 60644 | 71.7% | 33.3% (+38.3)#1,323 | 35.2% (+36.5)#30,128 |
| 53. | 60624 | 72.1% | 33.3% (+38.8)#1,324 | 35.2% (+36.9)#30,149 |
| 54. | 60637 | 74.3% | 33.3% (+41.0)#1,326 | 35.2% (+39.1)#30,245 |
| 55. | 60621 | 74.6% | 33.3% (+41.3)#1,327 | 35.2% (+39.4)#30,252 |
| 56. | 60649 | 75.5% | 33.3% (+42.2)#1,328 | 35.2% (+40.3)#30,287 |
1
Common Questions
What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago, IL?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago, IL are:
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago, IL?
60652 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago, IL with 15.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago, IL?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Chicago is 54.4%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Illinois is 33.3%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.