Haitian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Haitian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Haitian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
20.5%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Haitian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,231,337 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Haitians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 20.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Haitians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.21% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Haitians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Haitians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Haitians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Haitians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Haitians are Blackfeet (20.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Iroquois (20.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and Chippewa (20.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants from Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants from Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants from Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Haitian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Haitian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.095% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 40.3% | 53.2% |
Range | 40.3% | 51.7% |
Mean | 13.6% | 22.0% |
Median | 11.5% | 20.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 27.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 8.7% |
Correlation Details
Haitian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.095% | 201,819,117 | 18.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 29,330,319 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 12,676,332 | 19.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 6,563,361 | 18.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 12,221,324 | 21.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.83% | 2,935,470 | 22.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 2,327,212 | 17.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.53% | 1,355,864 | 19.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 1,273,527 | 18.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 2,314,326 | 20.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 902,114 | 12.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 933,240 | 13.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 325,559 | 21.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 756,646 | 21.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 306,461 | 19.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 752,861 | 19.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.50% | 414,312 | 19.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.88% | 485,059 | 19.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 704,683 | 20.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.47% | 160,947 | 26.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84% | 404,412 | 20.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.20% | 207,213 | 17.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.51% | 446,605 | 16.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.85% | 174,274 | 30.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.21% | 573,945 | 26.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60% | 207,256 | 18.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 115,715 | 24.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29% | 186,218 | 11.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 79,212 | 23.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 52,166 | 22.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.18% | 375,633 | 18.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.62% | 34,860 | 27.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.88% | 45,801 | 27.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.13% | 72,397 | 17.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.55% | 32,311 | 4.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.94% | 186,230 | 8.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.16% | 153,053 | 15.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.62% | 98,037 | 14.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 177,956 | 17.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.50% | 231,368 | 18.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.85% | 180,853 | 21.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.26% | 94,219 | 21.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.61% | 103,341 | 28.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.19% | 144,317 | 26.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 207,337 | 30.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.86% | 30,230 | 22.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 26,814 | 7.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.65% | 14,585 | 53.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.04% | 118,661 | 20.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.33% | 62,604 | 18.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.57% | 86,232 | 19.4% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 37,241 | 31.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.53% | 62,827 | 33.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.19% | 10,946 | 34.3% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.62% | 70,810 | 30.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.04% | 62,232 | 28.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.79% | 83,221 | 36.7% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.08% | 40,276 | 27.3% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.54% | 43,269 | 12.9% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.24% | 6,196 | 10.5% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 35,914 | 41.5% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.25% | 31,807 | 43.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.78% | 24,792 | 31.4% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.84% | 48,326 | 14.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.77% | 17,163 | 22.2% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.04% | 52,824 | 32.1% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.88% | 59,854 | 30.1% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.75% | 2,867 | 1.5% |
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.35% | 58,183 | 23.3% |