Czechoslovakian vs Irish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Irish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Irish
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Irish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,103,905 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 555,406,240 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.89%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Irish |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 57.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 54.2% | 95.2% |
| Mean | 21.9% | 29.4% |
| Median | 17.6% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 37.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.1% | 25.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 27.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 27.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Irish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Carpatho Rusyn (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and English (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |