Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chickasaw
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,606,644 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 22.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 17.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.2% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 44.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.0% | 88.9% |
Mean | 19.9% | 35.8% |
Median | 21.8% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.6% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |