Zimbabwean vs Yakama Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Yakama
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Yakama
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Yakama Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%, a difference of 45.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Yakama |
Minimum | 1.1% | 17.1% |
Maximum | 59.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.6% | 82.9% |
Mean | 18.9% | 42.1% |
Median | 18.6% | 38.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 52.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 26.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 22.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 21.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |