Kiowa vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Kiowa
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Kiowa
Chickasaw
26.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,984,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 26.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 2.6%.
![Kiowa vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/kiowa-vs-chickasaw-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 20.0% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 69.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 49.2% | 88.9% |
Mean | 34.9% | 35.8% |
Median | 31.9% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.4% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.4% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.98%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Creek (27.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |