Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Paraguayans
Chickasaw
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,675,073 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 36.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.7% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.3% | 88.9% |
Mean | 20.7% | 35.8% |
Median | 18.3% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Paraguayans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Paraguayans are Immigrants from Jordan (19.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Laotian (19.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Laotians | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |