Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Shoshone
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Shoshone
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,449,019 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 25.1%, a difference of 28.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
Minimum | 1.1% | 9.1% |
Maximum | 59.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.6% | 90.9% |
Mean | 18.9% | 39.8% |
Median | 18.6% | 30.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 24.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 50.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 25.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 23.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 23.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |