Belizean vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Belizean
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Belizeans
Chickasaw
22.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belizean vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,694,169 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358 and weighted average of 22.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 17.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Belizean | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.4% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 57.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.3% | 88.9% |
Mean | 24.6% | 35.8% |
Median | 22.2% | 30.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.5% | 42.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 19.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Belizeans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (22.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Caribbean (22.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bahamas (22.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from West Indies (22.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |