Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,419,717 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,849,753 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 10.7%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Soviet Union	Immigrants from Middle Africa
Minimum	0.48%	1.6%
Maximum	11.4%	12.6%
Range	10.9%	11.1%
Mean	3.9%	5.4%
Median	3.4%	5.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.7%	4.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	4.6%	6.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.9%	2.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.2%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.1%	2.4%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	90.2 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 4.9%
Samoans	90.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 4.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	89.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.9%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.7 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	86.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Lebanese (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Azores	27.5 /100 \| #195	Fair 5.4%
Spaniards	27.4 /100 \| #196	Fair 5.4%
Liberians	26.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Belarus	26.2 /100 \| #198	Fair 5.4%
Uruguayans	25.0 /100 \| #199	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	24.3 /100 \| #200	Fair 5.4%
Lebanese	24.1 /100 \| #201	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	23.8 /100 \| #202	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%