Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,682,696 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 6.5%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Costa Rica	Chickasaw
Minimum	0.67%	1.7%
Maximum	22.7%	17.6%
Range	22.1%	16.0%
Mean	5.8%	7.8%
Median	5.0%	7.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.1%	5.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.6%	9.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.5%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	3.3%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Liberians	26.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Belarus	26.2 /100 \| #198	Fair 5.4%
Uruguayans	25.0 /100 \| #199	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	24.3 /100 \| #200	Fair 5.4%
Lebanese	24.1 /100 \| #201	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	23.8 /100 \| #202	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| South America	3.1 /100 \| #237	Tragic 5.7%
Cherokee	2.7 /100 \| #238	Tragic 5.8%
Venezuelans	2.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 5.8%
Fijians	2.5 /100 \| #240	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Panama	2.5 /100 \| #241	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	2.4 /100 \| #242	Tragic 5.8%
Somalis	2.3 /100 \| #243	Tragic 5.8%
Chickasaw	2.3 /100 \| #244	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	2.1 /100 \| #245	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	1.8 /100 \| #246	Tragic 5.8%
Iraqis	1.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 5.9%
Cree	1.2 /100 \| #248	Tragic 5.9%
Tsimshian	1.1 /100 \| #249	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.1 /100 \| #250	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	1.0 /100 \| #251	Tragic 5.9%